Steph Smith: @alex_no_zander 是的，好点。尽管我认为这些公司的相对规模更大，即使不计入员工人数？让我想起了这一点：https://t.co/XK9uV5osMc 引用@stephsmithio 的推文：一个友好的提醒，没有一家公司是大到不能倒的。创新是平衡器，因为它很难做到： 1. 规模化 3.始终如一 3.长寿在 1989 年全球最大的 20 家公司中，0 家在今天的 20 家最大公司的名单中。 https://t.co/y8KAYSK16M

Posted on 2022-07-24

原推：@alex_no_zander Yes good point. Although I think relative scale of these companies is larger, even if not captured in headcount?

Reminds me of this: https://t.co/XK9uV5osMc

A friendly reminder that no company is too big to fail.

Innovation is an equalizer, since it’s so hard to do:

1. At scale

3. Consistently

3. With longevity

Of the world’s 20 biggest companies in 1989, 0 are on the list of the 20 biggest companies today. https://t.co/y8KAYSK16M