Naval: 海军转发： 今天纽约时报写了一篇关于 Substack 的文章。虽然对记录文件保持首要地位是一种恭维，但这篇文章包含许多道听途说、挑剔和作为事实呈现的个人观点。 在这里，我提供了一个替代框架并挖掘了埋藏的 lede：

Naval retweeted:

Today the NYTimes wrote an article about Substack. While it’s a compliment to remain top of mind for the paper of record, the piece contains a lot of hearsay, cherrypicking, and personal opinion presented as fact.

Here, I offer an alternate framing and excavate the buried lede: