Brett Winton: @katecrawford 这在第一原则上严重失败。 从气候的角度来看，赢得 ICE 的里程份额是有益的 以 50% 的利用率（robotaxi）而不是 5% 的利用率（个人拥有）运行电动汽车绝对是净收益 推理的能量成本相对于运动成本约为 0

原推：@katecrawford This massively fails on 1st principles.

Winning miles-share from ICE is net good from a climate perspective

Running EVs at 50% utilization (robotaxi) rather than 5% utilization (personally owned) is definitely net good

Energy cost of inference is ~0 relative to cost of motion
https://twitter.com/wintonARK/status/1620845206571724800