今天我想调查一下以太坊是如何卖给我的，我在研究事物时对它们的看法，以及其他一些值得考虑的加密货币哲学观点。作为我对此的另一个偏见，我很想使用像以太坊这样的东西来支付委托艺术品的费用，而不必担心像 PayPal 这样的支付处理器会取消该艺术品的帐户是色情作品。理想情况下，我希望能够给艺术家现金，但是当我与他们的唯一联系是通过 Internet 时，这并不奏效。
< Open Skies > 对我来说，为互联网上的内容付费的整个过程是……粗略的。就像，支付某人的步骤很多，每个人都想给我发电子邮件或注册订阅以每月支付高级内容，我需要滚动页面找到支付链接，然后通过多个表格并找到我的信用卡以输入号码或登录贝宝或其他。我真的很想能够喜欢……嘿，你在你的博客上免费发布的这项研究非常棒，并且节省了我三个小时试图从其他来源将它放在一起的时间。点击一下，你得到一美元，非常感谢你，我会在路上。另一方面，我希望能够拥有类似的东西，在我自己的内容上设置起来很简单，而不是需要广告对等和帐户，并且在我可以使用这笔钱之前有最低支出，并且烦人所有观众……
< Cadey > 令人惊讶的是，如果您要向其汇款的个人或企业拥有银行账户，很多问题实际上在加拿大得到了解决。您可以使用Interac通过电话号码或电子邮件地址向他人汇款。这就是我支付我的税务律师的方式，有一段时间它是我支付租金的方式。 This is only viable for bigger payments though, something like micropayments have never really taken off because of transaction fees, especially with cryptocurrencies.莱特币的交易费用非常低，但如果您的总付款是一美元，那么 4% 的交易费用听起来有点可笑。如果像Stellar这样的东西更可行，那就另当别论了。
< Cadey > It would be fine if these processes encouraged the use of splitting and backing up keys in ways that align with best practices across the industry, but they don’t.他们建议将您数字王国的所有钥匙放入一个保险箱。有些设备允许您对加密货币私钥进行硬件托管，但它们仍然鼓励您在纸上备份密钥。他们还表现得好像保险箱是免费的。他们不是。它们是昂贵的。
考虑到这一切，NFT 到底是什么？如果不是与该令牌相关的艺术，那是什么？让我们仔细看看“fungible”这个词。当某物是可替代的时，这意味着该物可以与其他类似的东西互换。一双普通的白色袜子与另一双普通的白色袜子基本相同。如果你有一张美元钞票，你可以用基本上任何其他的美元钞票来代替它，而且价值并没有真正改变。不可替代的物品不能像这样被替换。考虑一下任何一双白袜子和你在博士课程期间骑自行车上学时每天穿的那双白袜子之间的区别。这双袜子的价值超出了这些袜子的内在价值，可以作为一种遮盖身体的方式。不可替代的代币也不是可替代的。有元数据可以让你说你有一个通过 ID 的特定令牌，而不仅仅是集合中的任何令牌。它不像面包和油那样是可替代的。
< Cadey > I am skipping over a lot of economics speak here though.有些人更适合谈论这个。我不是其中之一。
人类的一大优点是，我们可以让事物意味着一件事，但最终它们对他人的意义会大不相同。 NFT 是这一原则的一个很好的例子。普遍的理解是拥有 NFT 意味着你拥有与之相关的艺术。 Consider the example of the people who bought that copy of Dune (one of the best science-fiction/fantasy books ever written) and were planning to adapt the book into a movie adaptation with a “decentralized autonomous organization (DAO)” at the reigns.
< Cadey > I’m not going to get into DAOs in this article. I don’t have enough experience in them to speak confidently about what I think about them. I’m not quite sure what purpose they serve though.
There’s not been any court cases to set legal precedent for what owning an NFT means. In the eyes of the blockchain people, they seem to think that owning the NFT means you own the copyright to the thing. This could mean that if you make a TV series planned around a character on an image associated with an NFT and then get the NFT social engineered away from you, you may have to cancel plans for the show unless you pay off the hacker to get the token back .
< Open Skies > Or you’ll have to admit that the blockchain isn’t the authority on intellectual property and your performative pretending that it is an authority is a scam in order to get money from people.
< Numa > “Code is law” my ass.
< Open Skies > Well, to some extent, an NFT can legally mean whatever you write a contract (traditional, not smart) for the NFT to mean. But that would require the court to decide on it, but I think there is an argument to be made that this would fall under the same umbrella as licensing terms, where you can sue someone for violating your licensing terms and require them to pay damages. That’s all speculation though, I haven’t heard of it being tested in court. “An argument to be made” doesn’t really mean much though; once upon a time someone made an argument that all internet moderation is illegal based on a legal precedent that a corporate town couldn’t prevent people from having fliers in a magazine display or something, and therefore we had to let them say anything they wanted anywhere they wanted or we’re violating the law. So we’ll see what happens in court when actual lawyers deal with it.
Without any formal guidance on what all this means or any kind of legal precedent for how to handle all this, it’s very unclear what owning an NFT actually does in the eyes of the law. If the NFT goes up in value by a significant amount of money, does that mean you owe capital gains tax? The government has really not caught up with the masses yet and a lot of cryptocurrency technology really exists in a gray area. The kind of gray area that gets dicey with the IRS. You do not want to get dicey with the IRS.
< Cadey > It seems that the US is treating cryptocurrency accounts like foreign accounts. I’m personally planning on filing my cryptocurrency accounts in my FBAR with my other Canadian accounts come tax season. It’s probably overkill, but it’s better to give the IRS more information than they need. Filing taxes is going to be fun this year. The sacrifices I make for you people’s amusement.
< Open Skies > I don’t own any cryptocurrency, so I don’t have to deal with the taxes!
I think it is probably best to treat NFTs as something close to sticker or stamp collecting. The tokens themselves are probably inherently worthless (save of course the minimum cost needed to deploy the contract associated with them and the gas fees to mint the tokens), but together they likely have sentimental value to the owner as well as an “aesthetic value” depending on what the creator of that NFT collection was doing when they designed the art itself.
There’s also NFTs called Proof of Attendance Protocol or POAP. These are like ticket stubs at concerts. They let you have collectables associated with specific events, gatherings, or other such things. There’s a POAP that’s there for anyone who was at the party to celebrate Ethereum’s merge to the proof of stake (read: not burning down the forests as much for magic internet money) chain. I personally haven’t seen a super good use for these yet, but I can confirm that they are a thing that exists. I really wish I had a good example of how to use these, but I just don’t.
< Open Skies > Something something digital resume fodder to show that you went to conferences/school? IDK.
To be honest though, if implemented correctly NFTs could really help the furry community. Ownership of “adoptables” or the right to use a “closed species” character would be unambiguous. They could even have resale value that gives a commission back to the original creator (provided the relevant smart contracts have a clause to factor this into the equation); and there would be a neutral registry that anyone can read from and confirm ownership of characters in cases where that is relevant to the participants.
< Open Skies > I could argue that adoptables and closed species and OCs and such are already de facto NFTs, just without any automation or engineered resistance to bad actors. Most artists will require the permission from the “owner” of the OCs before they draw the character. Adoptables are sold like NFTs, with an artist creating them whenever they feel like and putting them up for sale in a gallery that users can purchase from and they then “own” that unique art and rights to the character, though the artwork itself is still freely available online for anyone who likes to view or download.
< Numa > Or just right-click on the art and put it into the hypercloud. Take that, liberals!
< Open Skies > So, in practice, furry artwork is already NFTs, just implemented as an ad-hoc, undocumented, unverifiable social contract with bad actors, punishing the non-punishers, no way to actually check claims of wrongdoing or see if they’ve been resolved, and multiple incompatible social norms that people can’t just accept federation and say which section they’re in because none of them are documented and that person is the enemy and must be brought into line. Oh, and also beholden to the capricious whims of puritans putting pressure on payment processors or Patreon or whatever to rugpull artists and keep their money. This is *NOT GOOD.*
We can’t use any of that in furry-land because the NFT bros pissed off furry artists by scraping twitter, deviantart, and e621 to flip into cheap NFT grifting so much that the entire technology space has become wrongthink to some people. By doing all of this research and writing this article I have probably made some people block me, even though I’m ending up concluding that all of this space is a bad thing as currently implemented . It is difficult to describe the level of contempt that a lot of furries have for this technology. I have seen communities with previously irreconcilable differences come together to try and destroy scammers flipping their art into NFTs. So yeah, this entire tech would be revolutionary to the furry community, but nobody wants anything to do with it because idiots pissed in the pool and now it just smells like aging piss.
< Open Skies > Though I am very glad that furry culture does resist corporatization so strongly, because it would be a horrible loss for the beauty, diversity, and expression of the community to be paved by megacorp lawyers into a metaphorical parking lot or suburban lawn. I’m also very glad that furry culture has such strong social norms for supporting artists and making sure that such critical members of the community that produce so much value actually get to make a living from it. There is less paywalling in furry art than many other kinds of art, while furry artists also get reliably paid more than many other kinds of independent artists, and that’s great! Maybe with some effort we could solve some social and technical problems to reduce paywalls while also increasing the benefit of the artists, and make the environment better for everyone. But that seems… difficult right now. Maybe someday. For now we can just keep upholding the furry values of inclusion, freedom, kindness, weird porn, and punching nazis.
< Numa > Oh yeah, by the way: they want to use NFTs in video games.
< Mara > What? How does that make any sense?
< Cadey > Buckle up…
They want to share items in games
So imagine a world where you can share items between games. Let’s say that if you get a weapon in Splatoon you should be able to use it in other games. So you get a Splatana Wiper from Sheldon and you really like how it plays in the Splatoon meta. Then you close Splatoon and open up Call of Duty. The NFT bro dream is that you’d be able to pull the Splatana out of Splatoon and then drop it into your Call of Duty loadout so that you can whack people in the face with it for 120 damage.
Imagine if this could spread to other items too. Unlocking an outfit or weapon class for Sena in Xenoblade Chronicles 3 means you can take that outfit to other games like Fortnite. Grab a bunch of items from Harmony in Splatsville and then use them all to decorate your house in Animal Crossing!
< Mara > How would any of this actually…work? This sounds nice yeah but how would it make any sense? Maybe sharing items between Animal Crossing and Splatoon makes sense (they share a development team and game engine even). But Call of Duty and Splatoon are about as polar opposites as Quake and Chess. Wouldn’t that look like a mess kinda like VRChat or Second Life?
This won’t work at all in practice. Every one of those games I listed has its own unique art style and that artstyle dictates a lot about the vision and direction of the games in question.
< Cadey > Okay, Fortnite is a bit of an exception. It used to have a cohesive artstyle at the beginning, but over time it’s turned into a game where Rick from Rick and Morty, Goku, Naruto, and Marshmello can get into a squad together and Hadouken people to death; it’s more surreal than it sounds.
This would also make game balance nearly impossible. Taking that example of moving a Splatana from Splatoon into Call of Duty more literally, the Splatana does 30 damage when the fire button is tapped and up to 120 damage when the fire button is held and you beat someone in the face with it. This is balanced because each squid/octopus child thing has 100 hitpoints, so 4 basic shots splats an opponent and if you get good at reading people you can oneshot people around corners. The base player health in Call of Duty is anywhere from 100 to 150 . Depending on the game this could mean that the Splatana can either be about normally powered or hilariously underpowered to the point that you wouldn’t want to use it anyways.
< Open Skies > And then you bring it into Minecraft where players have 20 hit points and every attack is a one hit kill. But wait, do you lose it across all games when you die? Can you bring it with you every time you spawn?
< Numa > Does the ink coverage from the Splatana stay in the equation? Do you also get the Ultra Stamp special? How would games know to account for this?
< Open Skies > In Planetary Annihilation and Supreme Commander, the ink coverage from the Splatoon weapons would obviously be an auxiliary power generation mechanic, representing some kind of nanomachine based solar array. Which means that the meta for competitive play would require purchasing and progressing to high levels in games from completely different genres, and I can’t imagine the gaming community putting up with that. It would also require quadratic-or-worse balancing efforts where every game needs to care about the balance of every other game and write code to handle bringing items and mechanics in from every other game, and/or it would allow anyone who feels like self-publishing a game to home-brew a balance breaking super item in whatever game they want, and I can’t imagine that game developers would put up with that.
Oh, you missed something. Tie in mobile games released alongside a main desktop game occasionally share items between the two.
We do have one thing that is close to this ideal, but it’s very limited as you’d imagine. VTuber software is segmented into two types, 2D and 3D. I can’t speak much about the 2D software, but for 3D VTubers we use a model format called VRM as a vendor-neutral interchange format. I can pull my VRM avatar into other games such as Synth Riders and dance around on stream:
I can take that same model and plunk it into Godot and then animate it out to do whatever I want. The artstyle is maintained because all of these avatars have shading metadata that denotes them as anime styled. This is mainly because the VRM format was made by Japanese VTuber software developers and mostly because that’s what the whole project was intended to be used for: anime styled VTuber characters.
< Cadey > It’s pretty nice in practice, but there’s a depressing amount of software out there such as VRChat that won’t let me import a pre-rigged model, which means that I have to do a variety of annoying hacks to get things working.
< Open Skies > I have a few disagreements with the design of VRM, and a lot of annoyances at the lack of support for it. But that discussion is for another time.
< Mara > At least the VRM format works and it’s already supported by multiple engines. It will get adoption in time, it can also be extended if that is really needed. I really wish there were more games supporting it.
What is Ethereum worth?
Image generated by Waifu Diffusion v1.2 — the legend of zelda breath of the wild, mountain, mid-day, studio ghibli, space needle, river, guardian turret
I’ve been talking about Ethereum for most of this article because Ethereum is the cryptocurrency that everyone seems to base all their work on. It was the first chain where smart contracts and NFTs really took off. However, I’ve never really covered what Ethereum is really worth . What is an Ethereum token? How does it have value?
< Numa > >money >inherent value
pick one.
< Cadey > Okay, yes, from the philosophical standpoint modern currencies don’t really have value backed by anything. Once the US abolished the Gold standard the value of the US dollar was detached from the value of physical hunks of gold and it became a fiat currency . So in essence a dollar bill in your pocket doesn’t really have its own value outside of the mass psychosis that everyone experiences to think that the US dollar has value. At the same time though, the US government has this thing called “an army”, which kind of enforces the idea that the US dollar has value.
< Open Skies > The inherent value of one US dollar is that you could use it as toilet paper or burn it for heat in the winter or wrap something in it . Everything else comes from that little bit of text on it “This note is legal tender for all debts public and private” and the government enforcing it and the society humoring the collective delusion.
< Numa > Something something monopoly on violence something something.
So with all this in mind, what is Ethereum really worth? Honestly after doing a bit of research I can’t really find a solid answer to this seemingly simple question. Money is complicated. Economics is a very nihilist field of study when you peel back all the layers of terminology and math.
Ethereum used to be a proof of work consensus blockchain, which is a bunch of buzzwords that means that some nodes on the network called “miners” would have GPUs solving sudokus 24/7 in order to get a hash that met certain criteria. When that happened, the miner would be awarded with a block’s worth of tokens. Ethereum is also unlike other cryptocurrencies because Ethereum has no supply cap (the maximum number of tokens that can exist) unlike Bitcoin that has a cap of 21 million bitcoins ever being able to exist.
So if Ethereum is no longer a proof of work chain (IE: the price of an Ethereum token had value from the power wasted by the miner attempting to create it) and there’s no cap of how many tokens can exist, what is Ethereum really worth?
< Open Skies > The difficulty of the creation doesn’t create value, it creates scarcity. The value needs to come from something else. This is where gas fees come in. It’s tempting to say that the value of Ethereum is the amount of computation that can be purchased on the Ethereum blockchain by burning the eth for gas. But that doesn’t explain the price; computing on the Ethereum blockchain is really inefficient because of all the validators double checking the computations, so the amount of money it would cost to buy the computation on a cloud compute provider and the amount it would cost to buy on Ethereum if nothing else were in play are very different, and the actual price of gas doesn’t match that either. So they have to be paying for something , and that something is legitimacy. We can view Ethereum as a machine for taking one big agreement, the agreement about the consensus algorithm, the smart contract instruction set and runtime, and what the current head of the chain is, and transforming that into a billion tiny agreements about who owns what and how to handle every little transaction. In this view, the value of gas, and by extension the value of Ethereum, is the value of making trustworthy agreements about digital objects. And it turns out that globally accessible and verifiable trustworthy agreements about digital objects are extremely valuable .
< Mara > This is something that we haven’t really considered before. Before that argument I thought that Ethereum really just had the same worth that you get with government issued currency: everyone just agrees it has value and trading volume along with “market confidence” would dictate the value. Ethereum being worth the legitimacy of the system is a vastly different thing to think about.
What about the Ethereum VM? Don’t you use Ethereum as “gas” for the virtual machine that processes all the smart contract executions and transactions? How does that fit into it all?
< Open Skies > Not quite. You buy gas with Ethereum. The Ethereum VM is the language by which you describe the rules of how something is legitimate. If you want to make something that has legitimacy, you need to explain exactly how legitimate interactions with it go. For example, a legitimate interaction with a store is you pay a specific price and in exchange receive a specific good; if you do not offer enough, your money isn’t taken and you don’t get the good; if you offer too much you get the good and any excess back. A legitimate interaction with a voting booth is that you mark down your choice on each part of the ballot, possibly including marking abstain fields, and submit it to the vote exactly once; the voting booth guarantees that the ballot you cast will be included in the results and that no fictitious ballots that no person submitted or multiple ballots from the same person are included. These rules have to be written down to be enforced, and the more complicated the rules are to check and more state they depend on the more difficult they are to enforce: thus, the Ethereum VM is how the rules of legitimacy are written down so everyone can agree on them, and gas usage is the measure of how difficult it is to perform the transaction according to the rules so everyone agrees on it. When you submit a transaction to the Ethereum network, you include in it a marker for how much you are willing to pay per unit of gas, and how much gas you are willing to buy before you would rather not have the transaction go through. Different miners might have different amounts that they’re willing to sell gas for, and so being willing to pay more for gas means that a miner that is willing to accept that rate will be selected sooner and the transaction will complete sooner, and if you don’t pay enough a miner will never accept it. So this makes it so that you can effectively pay a premium for expedited processing of your transactions or pay lower rates for slower inclusions. Ethereum is the only thing you can buy gas with, so apart from regarding Ethereum as a speculative asset, gas is really where the value gets meaning. It’s the atomic cost of ensuring legitimacy for a single step of operation. (Things can be legitimate without the legitimacy being checked; it’s possible that the weird person on the subway with a deed written on toilet paper in crayon offering to sell the Mona Lisa for $100 actually is the legitimate owner and will honor the deal, but in order for other people to actually trust the legitimacy it needs to be checked in some way that people can trust, which takes effort and coordination and thus has to cost something , even if it’s “a miniscule amount of credits from a UBI or publically funded service” or “a nebulous tiny expenditure of social capital among the community” (if you’re wondering what something nebulous like that costs, just imagine that someone used and abused the thing so much that the providers had to stop them; what did they run out of that caused them to get dropped))
< Mara > That is a lot to think about. I don’t understand money at all.
< Numa > Oh just wait until we get into the unrestrained fun that is user-defined fungible tokens on the blockchain.
< Cadey > That may have to wait for part 3. This article is already an hour long.
I think the main takeaway here is that Ethereum is fundamentally worthless in the same way that US dollars are, but fiat mass psychosis and trading volume gives it value.
< Open Skies > Could you explain a bit more about what you mean about the value coming from mass psychosis? I’m not sure I agree.
< Cadey > Mass psychosis is probably a bit harsh, but I’m trying to get at that shared cultural delusion that money has value because everyone thinks it does. Like, what is a dollar really worth? What does it really signify?
< Open Skies > 26 grams of silver
< Numa > Not anymore!
< Open Skies > Yeah, now a dollar is worth 1.4 grams of silver. A dollar is worth what you can buy for it. You can sell a dollar for anything in the dollar store. It’s also worth a bit under a pound of rice.
< Cadey > This is going to end with financial nihilism even more isn’t it.
< Open Skies > I’m kinda already there? And from my perspective of financial nihilism, calling it mass psychosis is misleading; the value of a dollar is not a mass delusion, it is a reasonable, evidence based belief that you will be able to exchange the dollar for a given amount of stuff later. It’s just that there is no centrally mandated exchange rate to some other currency. Because gold is just another currency; you can’t eat gold, and only recently did it become useful in industrial processes that the average person cares about/is materially affected by (electronics manufacture, among others (which isn’t something the average person can do on their own, so that doesn’t affect the argument)), so gold is acting as just another currency: it’s value is based on the reasonable, evidence based belief that you will be able to trade it for a given amount of the stuff you want in the future. And it isn’t pegged to anything, so the value can fluctuate significantly as the market changes. So, way back when, a bank note/IOU/check from any local bank, an appraiser’s note, a dollar, a physical lump of gold, etc. were all fiscally equivalent in some sense by being denominated in terms of the same thing. It would be like making a currency in the modern day where each note of it corresponds to a given number of USD. (Like say $100 USD notes, which are pegged to the price of $1 USD notes, since you can exchange one for the other at any bank (though the pegging isn’t perfect; there is some fluctuation in the value so that the values of 1 $100 USD note and of 100 $1 USD notes aren’t exactly the same) or just a stablecoin.)
< Mara > A stable-what?
< Cadey > It’s definitely something for at least part 3. “Stablecoins” are a topic and a half.
Capitalism and ownership
Image generated by Waifu Diffusion v1.2 — populated bloodborne old valley with a obscure person at the centre and a ruined gothic city in the background, trees and stars in the background, falling red petals, epic red – orange moonlight, perfect lightning, wallpaper illustration by niko delort and kentaro miura, 4k
This all leaves me with a bit of a sour note. The idea that they are peddling is that cryptocurrency is a means of liberation against a “broken” financial system, but then the solution is just another means of limitation. Want to send a payment to a friend? That will cost ten cents to a dollar depending on the time of day. Want to get a new NFT? Ten cents to a dollar. Want to be in this club? Better get one of the tokens! They’re all sold out? Too bad! Buy one second-hand! It’s really just another method of dividing people into haves and have-nots. God knows we need more of them.
All of this really just adds more and more layers to this game of capitalism that we are all forced to play against our wills. Sure, the model of cryptocurrency allows you relative freedom within its rules, but there are still fundamental limitations to what you can do with things outside its cryptosystem. One of the artists I like to commission lives in Russia, so paying them is difficult (especially after Paypal pulled out of there) except for when I use cryptocurrency.
Don’t get me wrong, cryptocurrencies work great when the system is self-contained, but as soon as real money and assets get involved it becomes a huge mess. This relative freedom is another layer of capitalistic hierarchy and it helps the early adopters and the already rich get richer (through transaction fees and block rewards).
In practice though, the distributed ledger usually ends up having a few big players that sell blockchain API access as a service. The blockchain for Ethereum is over one terabyte. This is an insane amount of disk space. There are efforts to lessen this, but at the time of writing the blockchain is just too big for most people to use themselves. So you need blockchain access as a service. Which means you need to pay up to use your distributed money in the first place. This kind of defeats the point of having decentralized money if people are just going to recentralize around large players to be able to use it.
< Open Skies > One terrifying consequence of the way people interact with Ethereum is the existence of the generalized transaction frontrunning bot. We’ll have to get into what that actually means in a future part, but here there be monsters.
< Numa > The masses think they are free to send money to eachother but the rich just get richer off their backs along the way. As above, so below.
< Cadey > This whole thing is a mess. I only play this capitalism game because I have no other choice, not because I want to.
< Open Skies > Yeah. I just want to make useful things and help people, and only being allowed to make useful things at scale if I also make them artificially less useful in order to ensure I capture the value created by them is annoying.
结论
I don’t really have a good conclusion here. I don’t know how I feel about Ethereum. It’s got me split down the middle because there are good ideas here. There are things that if done correctly are genuinely useful. There’s just so many grifters. I didn’t want to go into the grifters too much in this article, there is going to be more in future parts to this series.
While I was writing this article I was contacted by someone representing a “play to earn” game (one where you get NFTs that act as game objects for playing a game connected to the blockchain) offering me 0.55ETH (about USD$731 at the time of writing) to make three tweets shilling their game that had 22 online players and no public client download. $731 isn’t even worth the tax burden (including my having to explain things to my accountant, who is probably going to go on a furious googling spree), not to mention the reputational damage that I would incur for shilling such a “product”.
< Cadey > Perfect timing, eh?
All of this technology is really cool, I just wish I could use it for anything productive. I’m able to commission that one artist with it at least. Maybe there will end up being some kind of killer app with all of this, but until then I’m just gonna keep playing video games and writing these near novel-length articles. I’m also going to have to continue blocking and reporting the scams people shovel at me on Twitter.
Image generated by Waifu Diffusion v1.2 — hacker hoodie 1girl Ethereum blockchain hatsune_miku twintails blue_hair laptop coffee starbucks blue_eyes anime waifu super hacker very cute
